The 7 Chatgpt and AI sins and their fixes

The 7 Chatgpt and AI sins and their fixes

1. No context


Why it fails: the model guesses your job, audience, and constraints. Guessing multiplies errors.

Quick fix: add role + task scope + constraints.

Before: “Analyze this.”

After: “You are a product analyst. Analyze the attached transcript for founders from seed to Series A to find the vision outliers. Output a 5-bullet decision memo. Max 180 words.”
2. Vague instructions


Why it fails: You didn’t define success.

Quick fix: Define success and acceptance tests.

Before: “Write about marketing trends.”

After: “Write a 1,000-word brief on the three most important B2B AI marketing trends for Q3 2025. Include one data point per trend with a source and a one-line implication.”
3. Treating it like Google


Why it fails: Asking questions is level 1. Give it directives.

Quick fix: Change questions into jobs with deliverables.

Before: “What are good onboarding ideas?”

After: “Draft a 5-step onboarding flow for a B2B SaaS. Include the email subjects, timing in days, and one KPI per step.”
4. Asking for everything at once


Why it fails: One giant ask hides failures and creates spaghetti outputs.

Quick fix: Split into steps and chain outputs.

Before: “Create our GTM plan, website copy, and investor memo.”

After, step 1: “List the 5 core customer jobs-to-be-done with a one-line pain for each.”

After, step 2: “Using the chosen JTBD 2 and 4, write homepage H1 options (5) within 8 words each.”

After, step 3: “Expand H1 #3 into a 150-word hero section.”
5. Not iterating


Why it fails: It’s a chat. So have a chat with it.

Quick fix: Critique-then-revise loop is the key.

Before: “Write the article.”

After, step 1: “List 5 potential angles for my article about [topic] to get eyeballs from [audience]. Focus on [niche].”

After, step 2: “Using the chosen angle, let’s write 10 SEO-ready titles with their one-liners summaries.”

After, step 3: “Using the chosen titles and one-liner, let’s create the outline of the article to…”
6. No format or tone


Why it fails: models default to generic structure and bland voice.

Quick fix: force the shape and the voice.

Before: “Announce the feature.”

After: “Write a LinkedIn post. 220 words. Hook (2 lines), 3 bullets, one CTA. Tone: direct and practical, no buzzwords, plain English.”


7. No examples


Why it fails: Examples are how models learn your taste.

Quick fix: Add 1–2 gold standards (and optionally one anti-example).

Before: “Write a landing page.”

After: “Model the tone and density on these two snippets [paste]. Avoid this anti-example [paste]. Keep sentence length under 16 words.”
The R-E-X Prompt



The R-E-X prompt is to define a role, give examples & set expectations in your (ChatGPT, or other AI) prompt.

Role
Define who the model is and the constraints of the job. Domain. Audience. Risk tolerance.
Examples
Paste one or two gold outputs to imitate. Add a short note on why they work. Optional anti-example.
Expectations
State format, length, tone, any banned words, a scoring rubric, and the iteration loop.

R-E-X 3-step checklist

Write the Role line.


Paste the Examples.


Set Expectations: format, word range, tone, rubric, and loop.




Role: Senior marketing analyst for non-technical leadership. Plain English. No hype.

Example to imitate: “CTR 1.8% vs 1.2% (+0.6pp). CPC $2.45 vs $3.10 (−21%). So what: shift budget to exact-match.”

Inputs I’ll paste: timeframe; channels; our metrics; benchmarks (or “none”). If anything’s missing, ask one precise question and stop.

Task: Compare us vs benchmarks; flag any KPI with ≥15% gap (better or worse).

Return in order: Summary (≤5 lines + one “so what”); Comparisons by channel inline; Findings (5–7 lines with likely cause + confidence H/M/L); Actions (top 3 with impact %, test days, difficulty L/M/H); Notes (methods + data risks).
Previous Post Next Post

نموذج الاتصال